Sector Intelligence describes the aim of understanding financial and market information not in isolation, but in context. The focus is not on the sheer volume of data, but on its structured linking, classification and continuous review in line with economic, technological and social developments.
The starting point is the systematic consolidation of the three leading international sector classifications. Each of these classifications follows its own logic, sets different priorities and offers a specific view of markets and companies. Only their combined consideration makes it possible to reduce blind spots, make border areas visible and interpret sector classifications more reliably.
Sector intelligence goes beyond pure classification, however. By using artificial intelligence, large volumes of structured and unstructured information are continuously analyzed, compared with each other and condensed thematically. AI does not serve as a substitute for analysis, but as an amplifier of human perception: it recognizes patterns, deviations and thematic shifts where linear evaluations reach their limits.
An essential component of the concept is also the international trading community as a living validation instance. Market participants contribute different perspectives, experiences and questions and thus act as a continuous corrective. Trends, narratives and classifications are not only recognized algorithmically, but also reflected, questioned and further developed in the real market environment.
This combination creates a multi-layered knowledge space:
Sector Intelligence therefore sees itself as a dynamic orientation model. It helps to classify developments before they become entrenched, to recognize correlations before they become obvious and to identify topics that only become apparent through the interplay of data, technology and market observation.
Not as a forecasting tool, but as an aid to thinking and navigation - for anyone who not only wants to observe markets, but also understand them.
How do you find the one needle in a haystack of information that really counts? And how do you separate the actual signal from the mere echo in a constant background noise of news, opinions and data streams? Perhaps it is less a question of quantity than of perspective. If you stay too far away, you only see movement - but no structure. If you zoom in too close, you lose the context. The G11-MicroSectors d/b/a Thematic Portfolios ("Themefolios") start exactly where the burning glass is focused: Not to generate more light, but to reduce scatter loss. Not to make every voice louder, but to make audible those that get lost in the noise. The decisive developments rarely emerge at the center of attention. They form at the margins, in detail, in small clusters - long before they become recognizable as a trend. So the question is not whether there are signals. It's where you look to recognize them.